Skip to main content
vastagbel radiologia - bor


1. W. AJAJ ET AL: MR colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy
Radiology 2005; 234: 452-459
2. T. AKASU ET AL: Thin-Section MRI with a Phased-Array Coil for Preoperative Evaluation of Pelvic
Anatomy and Tumor Extent in Patients with Rectal Cancer AJR 2005;184:531-538
3. M.A. BARISH ET AL:Consensus on Current Clinical Practice of Virtual Colonoscopy AJR
4. C. I. BARTRAM : Functional anorectal imaging Abdom Imaging (2005) 30:195–203
5. L. BOGONI ET AL:Computer-aided detection (CAD) for CT colonography: a tool to address a
growing need BJR:78 (2005), S57–S62
6. G. BROWN ET AL:Techniques and trouble-shooting in high spatial resolution thin slice MRI for
rectal cancer BJR 78 (2005), 245–251
7. A.F. CHRISTENSEN ET AL: Three-dimensional anal endosonography may improvediagnostic
confi dence of detecting damage to the anal sphincter complex BJR 78 (2005), 308–311
8. D. J.CHUNG ET AL: CT Colonography Using 16-MDCT in the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer AJR
9. COTTON PB ET AL: Coputed tomographic colonography(virtual colonoscopy):multicenter
comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA
10. C. P. DALY ET AL: Incidence of Acute Appendicitis in Patients with Equivocal CT Findings AJR
11. J.T.FERRUCCI: Colonoscopy: virtual and optical-another look, another view Radiology 2005; 235:
12. T.A. FOLEY: Differentation of nonperforated from perforated appendicits Radiology 2005; 235:
13. G. M. FORBES ET AL: Randomized single blind trial of two low-volume bowel preparations for
screening computed tomographic colonography Abdom Imaging (2005) 30:48–52
14. FUKUKURA ET AL: Acute appendicitis within a femoral hernia: multidetector CT fi ndings Abdom
Imaging (2005) 30:620–622
15. I.R.E. VAN GELDER ET AL: Colorectal cancer screening and Surveillance with CT colonography:
current controversies and obstacles Abdom Imaging (2005) 30:5–12
16. S. C. GOEHDE ET AL: Dark lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of
colorectal masses:accuracy and patient acceptance Abdom Imaging (2005) 30:576–583
17. F. GUTMAN ET AL: Incidental Colonic Focal Lesions Detected by FDG PET/CT AJR 2005;185.495- 500
18. S. HALLIGAN ET AL: CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer Radiology
2005; 237: 893-904
19. C. HEFFERNAN ET AL: Stercoral Colitis Leading to Fatal Peritonitis: CT Findings AJR 2005;1189-1193
20. R. IANNACCONE, ET AL: Colorectal carcinoma: detection and staging with multislice CT (MSCT)
colonographyin Abdom Imaging (2005) 30:13–19
21. G. IINUMA ET AL: Vascular Virtual Endoluminal Visualization of Invasive Colorectal Cancer on
MDCT Colonography AJR 2005;184;1194-98
22. JARDINE ET AL: MR colonography: baseline appearance of the unprepared rectosigmoid BJR 78
(2005), 202–206
23. K. T. JOHNSONET AL: CT colonography: determination of optimal CT technique using a novel
colon phantom Abdominal Imaging© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 200310.1007/s00261-
24. T. KAIDO, M. KANO, S. SUZAKI, K. YANAGIBASHI, M. SHIOTA: Colon stenosis caused by old portal vein
thrombosisIm Abdom Imaging (2005) 30:358–360
25. E. KEKILLI, C. YAGMUR, B. ISIK, O. M. AYDIN: Calculating colon transit time with radionuclide-fi lled
capsules in constipated patients: a new method for colon transit study Abdom Imaging (2005)
A vastagbél | 171
172 | Gastro Update 2006
26. C.A. KUEHLE ET AL: Contrast-Enhanced Dark Lumen PET/CT and MR Colonography in a Rodent
Polyp Model: Initial Results with Histopathologic Correlation AJR 2005;185:1045-1047
27. M. KUSANAGI ET AL: Phlebosclerotic Colitis: Imaging–Pathologic Correlation AJR 2005;185.
28. J. H. LEE ET AL: Operator-Dependent Techniques for Graded Compression Sonography to Detect
the Appendix and Diagnose Acute Appendicitis AJR 2005;184:91-97
29. P. LEFERE ET AL: CT Colonography After Fecal Tagging with a Reduced Cathartic Cleansing and
a Reduced Volume of Barium AJR 20505;184:1836-1842
30. N. P. LEITE ET AL: CT Evaluation of Appendicitis and Its Complications: Imaging Techniques and
Key Diagnostic Findings AJR 2005;185;406-417
31. C. D. LEVINE ET AL: Why We Miss the Diagnosis of Appendicitis on Abdominal CT: Evaluation of
Imaging Features of Appendicitis Incorrectly Diagnosed on CT AJR 2005;184:855-859
32. G. LUCCICHENTI ET AL: Radiologic Assessment of Rectosigmoid Cancer Before and After
Neoadjuvant Radiation Therapy: Comparison Between Quantitation Techniques AJR
33. M. MACARI: CT colonography: the real deal Abdom Imaging (2005) 30:184–194
34. M. MACARI: CT colonography: where have we been and where are we going Radiology 2005;
237: 819-833
35. F. MACCIONI, M. C. COLAIACOMO, S. PARLANTI: Ulcerative colitis: value of MR imaging Abdom Imaging
(2005) 30:584–592
36. P. P. MAINENTI ET AL: Added value of CT colonography after a positive conventional colonoscopy:
impact on treatment strategynAbdom Imaging (2005) 30:42–47
37. T. G. MANG ET AL: Detectability of Small and Flat Polyps in MDCT Colonography Using 2D and
3D Imaging Tools: Results from a Phantom Study This Article AJR 2005; 185:1582-1589
38. V. MARKOS, S. KELLY, W. C. YEE, J. E. DAVIS, R. E. CHEIFETZ AND A. ALSHEIKH : Phlebosclerotic Colitis:
Imaging Findings of a Rare Entity AJR 2005;184:1584-1586
39. M. MATSUKI ET AL. : Virtual CT colectomy by three-dimensional imaging using multidetector-row
CT for laparoscopic colorectal surgery Abdominal Imaging Springer Science+Business Media,
Inc. 2005 10.1007/s00261-005-0328-2
40. E. NERI ET AL: CT colonography: contrast enhancement of benign and malignant colorectal
lesions versus fecal residuals Abdominal Imaging Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
2005 10.1007/s00261-005-0340-6
41. OKAMOTO ET AL: Enterocele associated with rectocele revealed by dynamic pelvic CT Abdominal
Imaging© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005A. Özgün et al: Polyp Detection with
MDCT: A Phantom-Based Evaluation of the Impact of Dose and Spatial Resolution AJR
42. S.H.PARK ET AL: Fals negative results et multi-detector row CT Radiology 2005;235;495-502
43. P.J. Pickhardt PJ et al: Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal
neoplasia in asymptomatic adults N Engl J Med 2003; 349:2191-2200(1)
44. P. J. PICKHARDT ET AL: Adenomatous Polyp Obscured by Small-Caliber Rectal Catheter at LowDose
CT Colonography: A Rare Diagnostic Pitfall AJR 2005;184:1581-1583
45. P. J. PICKHARDT: CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy) for primary colorectal screening:
challenges facing clinical implementation Abdom Imaging (2005) 30:1–4
46. D. REGGE ET AL: Ileocecal valve imaging on computed tomographic colonography Abdom
Imaging (2005) 30:20–25
47. T. RIPOLLÉS ET AL: Sonographic Findings in Ischemic Colitis in 58 Patients AJR 2005;184:777-785
48. P. ROGALLA ET AL : Spasmolysis at CT colonography Radiology 2005; 236: 184-188
49. G. A. J. SEMPERE ET AL: MRI Evaluation of Infl ammatory Activity in Crohn’s Disease AJR
50. J. SOSNAET AL: Extracolonic fi ndings at CT colonography Abdominal Imaging© Springer
Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005 10.1007/s00261-005-0333-5
51. R. M. SUMMERS ET AL: Computer-Aided Detection of Polyps on Oral Contrast–Enhanced CT
Colonography AJR 2005;184:105-108
52. N.A. WAGNER-BARTAK ET AL: Crohn’s Disease in the Ileal Pouch After Total Colectomy for Ulcerative
Colitis: Findings on Pouch Enemas in Six Patients AJR 2005;184:1843-1847
53. H. YOSHIDA ET AL: CAD techniques, challenges, and controversies in computed tomographic
colonographyI Abdom Imaging (2005) 30:26–41
54. J.YU ET AL: Helical CT Evaluation of Acute Right Lower Quadrant Pain: Part II, Uncommon
Mimics of Appendicitis AJR 2005;1143-1149
55. T XIONG ET AL: Incidental lesions found on CT colonography: their nature and frequency BJR 78
(2005), 22–29
56. M.E. ZALIS: CT colonography reporting and data system: A consensus proposal Radiology
2005; 236:3-9

Leave a Reply

Close Menu


Munkatársaink szívesen állnak rendelkezésre alábbi elérhetőségeinken: